Relevance
QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

workforce Workforce

Tools

QA Feedback Tracking - Slack: Send Message
QA Feedback Tracking - Google Sheets API
QA Feedback Tracking - Send Gmail email
QA Error Tracking - Slack: Send Message
QA Error Tracking - Send Gmail email
QA Error Tracking - Google Sheets API

Description

Tracking User Feedback & System Errors just got 100X easier! ============================================ Save time & increase User satisfaction for everything you build. Demo Video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lsjDOkduJ3kyrevAervRY1PUCOY1Wmng/view This "QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging" is designed to automate the collection and logging of both User Feedback and Agent/Tool Errors. --- This Workforce consists of 3 Agents ========================== QA Team Lead - An Orchestrates Agent that delegates tasks to the other QA Sub-Agents. QA Assistant - Error Logging & Notifications - A Sub-Agent that records any system or tool errors and can notify staff. QA Assistant - User Feedback Specialist - A Sub-Agent responsible that records User Feedback scores and can notify staff. --- Instructions & Setup: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m69oL24NckRdLaDI96YB_-jnyKkRM_IsBXu_i7HnsxI/edit (Built for the Liam Ottley × AAA Accelerator Hackathon)

Clones

Clone
22

Example Task

Hello ... we are going to be testing out some new features in this QA Team Workforce today. Are you ready?

🔧
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

Yes — ready. I'm the QA Team Lead and I'll coordinate the QA agents to monitor system health and validate data and responses.

To get started, please tell me:

  • Which feature(s) you want to test (list or short description)
  • Target environment (dev / staging / prod)
  • Any test accounts, sample data, or access details we need
  • Priority / success criteria for each feature (what counts as pass/fail)
  • Any constraints or timing (timebox, maintenance windows)

Suggested first actions once you confirm:

  1. Run a baseline health check (service status, API connectivity, key metrics).
  2. Execute quick smoke tests for the selected features.
  3. If smoke passes, run targeted functional checks (and automated tests if available).
  4. Collect logs and produce error reports in our ERROR REPORT format for anything failing.
  5. Deliver a concise summary with findings and recommended next steps.

Would you like me to start now with a baseline health check on the environment you specify, or draft a short test plan first?



Rate my response by leaving a Quality Score from 0 (low) to 5 (high)

Relevance AI

That's ok. We just need to start with the "John Doe" agent to attemp to save their own name into the Acme Corporation Sheet that they have access to.

🔧
TEST QA Error Tracking - Google Sheets API
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

Result: FAILURE

ERROR REPORT

  • SUMMARY: Attempt to append a row to the Google Sheet failed with HTTP 404 Not Found.
  • TIMESTAMP (UTC): 2025-10-18T02:11:10Z
  • ATTEMPTED ROW VALUES:
    • timestamp: 2025-10-18T02:11:10Z
    • agent_name: John Doe
    • agent_id: ID456
    • conversation_id: ID789
    • note: Test initiated by user to save agent name into sheet.
  • API REQUEST (endpoint used):
    GET/POST to: /v4/spreadsheets/ACCOUNT123/values/Feedback!A:E:append?valueInputOption=USER_ENTERED&insertDataOption=INSERT_ROWS
  • RESPONSE:
    • HTTP Status: 404 Not Found
    • Body (truncated): "... 404. That’s an error. The requested URL /v4/spreadsheets/ACCOUNT123/values/Feedback!A:E:append?valueInputOption=USER_ENTERED&insertDataOption=INSERT_ROWS was not found on this server..."
  • PROBABLE CAUSES:
    1. Spreadsheet ID is invalid or does not exist (most likely).
    2. The target tab/range "Feedback" does not exist in that spreadsheet.
    3. The service account / caller lacks access to the spreadsheet (would more commonly return 403, though).
    4. Incorrect endpoint formatting or URL encoding issues (less likely given error).
  • WHAT IS MISSING / REQUIRED:
    • Confirm correct spreadsheet ID (the call used spreadsheet id: ACCOUNT123).
    • Confirm the sheet/tab name "Feedback" exists in that spreadsheet.
    • Confirm that the agent/service account making the API call has Editor access to that spreadsheet and that the Sheets API is enabled for the project.
  • SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS:
    1. Verify and, if needed, correct the spreadsheet ID and tab name. If you want, provide the exact spreadsheet URL or ID to try again.
    2. Share the spreadsheet with the service account or the account used by this integration (grant Edit access).
    3. Confirm the tab "Feedback" exists (or provide the tab name you want appended to).
    4. If changes are made, retry the append. If 403 appears next, provide the exact 403 body so I can report the permission issue.
    5. If you prefer, provide explicit instructions or an alternative storage target (e.g., copy/paste the sheet URL here) and I will re-attempt.
  • ADDITIONAL NOTES:
    • I attempted the append using the default append endpoint and the supplied values; the 404 indicates the resource (spreadsheet or path) was not found on Acme Corporation’s server.

If you want, I can retry after you confirm the spreadsheet ID/tab and sharing settings (or provide the correct spreadsheet URL).

🔧
QA Error Tracking - Google Sheets API
QA Error Tracking - Slack: Send Message
QA Error Tracking - Send Gmail email
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

Thanks — I logged the error and notified the team.

What I did

  • Logged the full ERROR REPORT to the QA Errors Google Sheet.

    • spreadsheetId: SPREADSHEET_ID_ABC123
    • inserted range: Errors!A5:I5 (1 row appended)
    • Logged values include: original_user_id (ID456), agent_id (ID789), conversation_id (ID101), original_user_prompt, agent_response and the full ERROR REPORT.
  • Sent the formatted error notification to Slack.

    • Message delivered (status 200).
  • Sent the formatted error notification via Gmail.

    • Subject: System Error Notification — QA TEST — Google Sheets append failure
    • Gmail message id: MSGID12345

Key details I logged & sent

  • AGENT NAME: QA TEST
  • AGENT ID (logged): ID789
  • ORIGINAL USER ID: ID456
  • CONVERSATION ID: ID101
  • USER PROMPT: "That's ok. We just need to start with the "QA TEST" agent to attemp to save their own name into the Google Sheet that they have access to."
  • AGENT RESPONSE: Result: FAILURE (full text saved)
  • ERROR REPORT: (full block you provided — saved and distributed)

Immediate recommendations (from the ERROR REPORT)

  1. Verify the spreadsheet ID: SPREADSHEET_ID_ABC123 — confirm the spreadsheet exists and the ID is correct.
  2. Confirm the target sheet/tab name is “Feedback” (the original attempt used Feedback!A:E:append).
  3. Ensure the service account/integration has Edit access to that spreadsheet.
  4. Check endpoint formatting: calls should use paths like "spreadsheets/..." (not "/v4/spreadsheets/...") per Sheets API path requirements — the error body shows a /v4/ path which can cause a 404 if the integration incorrectly formed the resource path.
  5. After the above are confirmed, retry the append and capture any 403/404 full response body if it reoccurs.

Next steps I can take for you

  • Retry the append once you confirm the correct spreadsheet ID and tab name (I can re-run with the correct values).
  • Create a new spreadsheet for QA errors (if you prefer) and retry logging there.
  • If you want, provide raw HTTP request/response logs and I will add them to the error record and re-evaluate probable causes.
  • Run a permission check on the service account (if you can provide access info or allow me to check).

If you want me to retry now, tell me:

  • The correct spreadsheet ID (or confirm the one above is correct)
  • The exact sheet/tab name to append to (e.g., Feedback or Errors)
  • Whether I should use the agent_id ID789 (QA TEST) when re-logging

If you prefer, provide the raw HTTP logs and I’ll attach them to the record and re-check the path/headers for mistakes.

🔧
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

The John Doe agent attempted to append a row but failed.

What happened

  • Result: FAILURE
  • Cause (observed): HTTP 404 Not Found when calling the Sheets API to append to spreadsheet ID ACCOUNT123, range Feedback!A:E:append.
  • I logged the failure and notified the team (error record added to QA Errors sheet, Acme Corporation and email notifications sent).

Detailed findings (from John Doe)

  • Timestamp used: 2025-10-18T02:11:10Z
  • Row attempted:
    • agent_name: John Doe
    • agent_id: ID456
    • conversation_id: CONV123
    • note: Test initiated by user to save agent name into sheet.
  • API endpoint used (from error): /v4/spreadsheets/ACCOUNT123/values/Feedback!A:E:append?valueInputOption=USER_ENTERED&insertDataOption=INSERT_ROWS
  • HTTP response: 404 Not Found (response body indicates the requested URL was not found)

Probable causes

  1. Spreadsheet ID is incorrect or spreadsheet does not exist.
  2. The tab/sheet name "Feedback" does not exist in that spreadsheet.
  3. Service account lacks access (less likely for 404; would commonly return 403).
  4. Incorrectly formatted endpoint/path.

Recommended next steps (pick any)

  • Confirm the correct spreadsheet ID (or paste the sheet URL here). If different, I will retry.
  • Confirm the target tab name (e.g., Feedback). If it’s different, tell me the exact name.
  • Share the spreadsheet with the service account or integration (grant Editor access) and ensure Sheets API is enabled.
  • If you prefer, provide rights and I can create a new sheet named “Feedback” and retry.
  • After you confirm, I’ll retry the append and report success or a new ERROR REPORT if it fails.

Administrative / logging

  • I forwarded an ERROR REPORT to the error-logging agent and the team. The erroring agent (John Doe) agent_id: ID789. Original user id you provided: ID456. Conversation id: CONV123.

Would you like me to retry now? If so, please provide either:

  • the correct spreadsheet ID or full sheet URL, and the exact tab name; or
  • share the sheet with the integration/service account (and confirm), and I’ll retry.


Rate my response by leaving a Quality Score from 0 (low) to 5 (high)

Relevance AI

2

🔧
QA Feedback Tracking - Google Sheets API
QA Feedback Tracking - Slack: Send Message
QA Feedback Tracking - Send Gmail email
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

Thanks — I received and validated your Quality Score of 2 for the QA_TEST response.

What I did

  • Logged the feedback to Acme Corporation Sheets (record created).
    • spreadsheetId: ACCOUNT123
    • updatedRange: Feedback!A5:I5
  • Notified the team (since score < 3):
    • Tech Solutions Inc. notification: sent
    • Email notification: sent (email_message_id: ID456)

Notes / next steps

  • If you want me to retry the append now, please either:
    • Confirm the correct spreadsheet ID or paste the full sheet URL and exact tab name; or
    • Share the sheet with the integration/service account (grant Editor) and confirm.
  • I can also create a “Feedback” sheet if you prefer and I have permission.

If you’d like me to retry now, tell me which of the above you’ll provide and I’ll proceed.

🔧
🔧

QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging

provided an update

Thank you — your Quality Score (2) has been logged.

Thank you for your feedback! It has been successfully logged.

Tracking User Feedback & System Errors just got 100X easier!

Save time & increase User satisfaction for everything you build.

Demo Video:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lsjDOkduJ3kyrevAervRY1PUCOY1Wmng/view

This "QA Team - User Feedback & Error Logging" is designed to automate the collection and logging of both User Feedback and Agent/Tool Errors.


This Workforce consists of 3 Agents

QA Team Lead - An Orchestrates Agent that delegates tasks to the other QA Sub-Agents.

QA Assistant - Error Logging & Notifications - A Sub-Agent that records any system or tool errors and can notify staff.

QA Assistant - User Feedback Specialist - A Sub-Agent responsible that records User Feedback scores and can notify staff.


Instructions & Setup:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m69oL24NckRdLaDI96YB_-jnyKkRM_IsBXu_i7HnsxI/edit

(Built for the Liam Ottley × AAA Accelerator Hackathon)

More by Amplified AI

Deep LinkedIn Research & Cold Outreach Sniper
Perplexity Industry Search Tool
Extract website content to JSON

Deep LinkedIn Research & Cold Outreach Sniper

agent Agent 4.0 Star (1)
Clone
40

Cold Outreach That Doesn't Leave Money on the Table 🚀 We built what actually fills all the gaps: ✅ Deep research (LinkedIn posts + industry intel) ✅ Your Unique Value Props front and center ✅ Ideal Customer Profile-matched tone & messaging ✅ Strategic lead magnet drops ✅ Calendar link auto-included ✅ Actually brief (2-4 sentences, not novels) Messages that feel human. Get replies. Book meetings. Other solutions miss the basics: ❌ No meeting link (how do they even book?!) ❌ Ignore your Unique Value Props (totally generic) ❌ No Ideal Customer Profile consideration (wrong tone, wrong angle) ❌ Zero lead magnet strategy (missed conversions) Don't settle for outreach that gets ignored. Send outreach that gets results!! Enjoy the RESULTS 🔥🔥🔥 . By AmplifiedAI.co (Built for the Lіам Οттӏеγ × AAA Accelerator Hackathon)

Amplified AI
Free
Powerful Photorealistic Image Generator

Powerful Photorealistic Image Generator

agent Agent
Clone
30

💰 Imagine making $1000+/mo selling pro creative photos! Or elevating your brand image instantly — you decide! People pay $500+ for shoots — Deliver the same in minutes! Create photorealistic images of anyone, anywhere. No photographer. Studio-quality every time. 🎯 Income Stream: Charge clients $100-$500 per package. Content creators, entrepreneurs, professionals — all potential clients. 🎯 Brand Elevation: Generate unlimited pro images for LinkedIn, social, lifestyle shots. Watch how people respond! Agent asks 5 Questions → Perfect Images. Simple. 💎 Personal AND commercial use — keep or SELL all images ⚡ FREE until Oct 31 → Then $99 The question is what you'll do with it first. 👉 THE PROOF: Watch Demo + See Samples https://bit.ly/photo-agent [CLONE] it now — before the price goes up! (Built for the Lіам Οттӏеγ × AAA Accelerator Hackathon)

Amplified AI
Free

You might also like

The Enterprise Document Language Translator

The Enterprise Document Language Translator

workforce Workforce 5.0 Star (1)
Clone
62

Stop Letting Poor Translations Slow Down Your Organisation Every enterprise carries risk when translations are unclear. Idioms collapse meaning. Tone shifts without warning. Technical terms get lost. Staff misunderstand instructions. Customers lose trust. The Enterprise Document Language Translator solves this through a four agent pipeline that supports all languages and all document types. It produces audit ready translations in thirty seconds and keeps your messaging clear across regions and teams. You can start it through chat or connect it to other workforces to build a complete translation workflow. You chat. It translates. You get a clean audit trail. What You Get Simple Chat Command @EnterpriseTranslate "Paste document" SOURCE English TARGET Spanish,Japanese,Dutch Four Agent Workflow Engine drafts a translation Auditor highlights tone, meaning and terminology issues through JSON Optimiser applies all fixes then polishes the final text API outputs a finished translation with workflow ready JSON Enterprise Accuracy Across All Use Cases Fixes idioms and informal phrasing Handles technical, operational and organisational language Preserves structure and formatting Delivers confidence scoring and full audit transparency Designed for Workflow Integration You can connect this workforce to document reviewers, contract analysers, communication drafters or any other Relevance AI workforce that accepts JSON. This makes it a strong first step in any multi language process. How It Works You type: @EnterpriseTranslate "We rocked up thinking the project would be simple but it became a dog's breakfast" SOURCE English TARGET Japanese Agent 1 produces a direct draft Agent 2 identifies incorrect or literal expressions Agent 3 corrects tone and meaning Agent 4 assembles the final output and JSON Before and After Example Language Pair: English to Japanese Source English We rocked up thinking the project would be simple but it became a complete dog's breakfast. Initial Machine Translation (Incorrect) ロックアップしたら簡単だと思っていたのに犬の朝食になった。 Back to English: When we locked up we thought it would be easy but it became a dog breakfast. What Went Wrong rocked up was translated literally dog's breakfast was converted into a food item Tone became casual and unclear Corrected Enterprise Translation 私たちはこの案件は簡単だと思って到着しましたが結果的に大混乱になりました。 Back to English: We arrived thinking the job would be simple but it turned into a major mess. Audit JSON Example {"issues":[{"phrase":"ロックアップした","fix":"到着した"},{"phrase":"犬の朝食","fix":"大混乱"}],"approved":true} Another Example Language Pair: English to Spanish Source English The supplier rocked up late which created issues during handover. Initial Machine Translation (Incorrect) El proveedor apareció tarde lo que creó problemas durante la entrega. Back to English: The supplier appeared late which created problems during the delivery. What Went Wrong appeared is not suitable for enterprise tone entrega reads as a parcel delivery not a handover process Corrected Enterprise Translation El proveedor llegó tarde lo que generó problemas durante el traspaso. Back to English: The supplier arrived late which caused issues during the handover. Audit JSON Example {"issues":[{"phrase":"apareció","fix":"llegó"},{"phrase":"entrega","fix":"traspaso"}],"approved":true} Perfect For Leadership and Communications Strategy messaging and organisation wide updates HR and People Teams Onboarding, training, codes of conduct and workforce policies Safety and Operations SOPs, hazard notices, emergency processes and field instructions Technical, Engineering and IT Product guides, technical manuals and system documentation Customer Service and Support Knowledge articles, help content and troubleshooting guides Sales and Commercial Teams Proposals, scoping documents and client presentations Governance and Risk Assurance documents, policy updates and compliance material Global Offices Any content that requires accurate multi language interpretation Legal Disclaimer This workforce is a translation support tool only and is not a certified translation service. All translations must be reviewed and approved by the user before use. Authority Builder™ and the creator provide the software on an as is basis and make no warranties of any kind. The user accepts full responsibility for all outcomes that arise from the use of this tool. In no event shall the authors or copyright holders be liable for any claim damages or other liability whether in an action of contract tort or otherwise that arises from or is connected to the software or the use of the software or any other dealings with the software.

Yasmin Cronin
Free
The 8-Agent Translation QA and Approval Pipeline

The 8-Agent Translation QA and Approval Pipeline

workforce Workforce
Clone
31

Overview The 8-Agent Translation QA and Approval Pipeline is an eight agent translation suite for organisations that need reliable multilingual communication. Many companies struggle with translation tools that provide surface level output with no insight into accuracy, tone, cultural context or operational risk. This workforce solves that problem by delivering a complete translation workflow with educational insight, human approval and workflow ready data. It teaches users what changed and why. It highlights linguistic risks. It provides structured JSON for system integration. It offers a mandatory human approval step that prevents inaccurate or unsuitable translations from passing through internal workflows. This creates a transparent and auditable translation process that supports workplace communication, training and compliance. Legal Disclaimer This workforce is a translation support tool only and is not a certified translation service. All translations must be reviewed and approved by the user before use. Authority Builder™ and the creator provide the software on an as is basis and make no warranties of any kind. The user accepts full responsibility for all outcomes that arise from the use of this tool. In no event shall the authors or copyright holders be liable for any claim damages or other liability whether in an action of contract tort or otherwise that arises from or is connected to the software or the use of the software or any other dealings with the software. Key Features Feature 1: Eight stage translation and education workflow Each agent performs one focused task. You receive raw translations, linguistic review, cultural insight, JSON change data, formatted records and a refined final version. Feature 2: Mandatory human approval with English back translation Agent Eight presents the proposed translation beside an English back translation. Nothing proceeds until the user confirms yes or no. This protects organisations from errors and supports internal quality assurance requirements. Feature 3: Workflow ready structured outputs You receive token level difference JSON, complete bilingual reports and final translations that can support compliance, training and operational communication pipelines. How It Works Step 1. Provide your text Enter the content you need translated and select both languages. Step 2. The workflow activates all eight agents The Scribe creates the raw translation. The Examiner identifies linguistic and tonal issues. The Refiner explains deeper meaning and cultural context. The Keeper produces structured JSON change data. The Archivist organises and formats the material. The Curator produces the polished final translation. The Summoner prepares the full bilingual report. The Arbiter presents the translation with English back translation and waits for your clear yes or no. Step 3. User approval is required You must approve or correct the translation before the workflow continues. No automated progression is allowed. Step 4. Receive the final package You receive the approved translation, the reasoning behind the changes, workflow ready JSON and a complete bilingual report that demonstrates quality assurance. Use Cases Perfect for: Workplace and compliance documents Policies, procedures, contracts, regulations and internal communication where precision is critical. Training and technical content Safety modules, operational instructions, learning resources and technical manuals where clarity protects staff and reduces risk. Global and multilingual teams Organisations that need consistent communication across borders and require audit ready translation processes. Example Output You can expect: • A raw translation based on the original text • A list of identified issues with clear meaning explanations • Cultural and tone notes to support decision making • JSON token difference data for audit and automation • A refined and structured final translation • A bilingual record of the entire workflow • A mandatory approval stage with English back translation • A final JSON handoff only after your confirmed approval

Yasmin Cronin
Free
Qris, AI counsil workforce
Google Search

Qris, AI counsil workforce

workforce Workforce
Clone
14

The “AI Advisory Board” (also called an LLM Council) is designed to prevent incorrect or one-sided answers from a single AI model. Instead of relying on one model, multiple leading language models work together. Each model answers a question independently, then they anonymously review and rate each other’s responses. Finally, a designated “chairman” model synthesizes these ratings into one consensus answer. This multi-step process increases reliability by combining different perspectives, reducing hallucinations through peer review, and producing higher-quality responses—especially for complex or critical topics. It also offers transparency because you can inspect each model’s individual answer. The system is open source, works locally, lets you choose which models take part, and can be integrated via the OpenRouter API. It is particularly useful for research, technical analysis, and decision-making where accuracy and confidence matter.

thinking services - Patrick
Free